Mutex vs Semaphore – Difference Between Them (2024)

Key Difference Between Mutex and Semaphore

• Mutex is a locking mechanism, whereas Semaphore is a signaling mechanism
• Mutex is just an object,while Semaphore is an integer
• Mutex has no subtype, whereas semaphore has two types: counting semaphore and binary semaphore.
• Semaphore supports wait and signal operations modification, whereas Mutex is only modified by the process that may request or release a resource.
• Semaphore value is modified using wait () and signal () operations, on the other hand, Mutex operations are locked or unlocked.

Here, I have analyzed the difference between Mutex and Semaphoreand will comprehensively evaluate their pros and cons.

Common Facts about Mutex and Semaphore

Drawing from my practice, here are a few common facts about Mutex vs Semaphore:

• Only one task can acquire the mutex. Thus, a mutex has ownership, and only the owner can release it.
• The reasons for using mutex and semaphore are different maybe because of similarity in their implementation, a mutex would be referred to as binary semaphore.
• One highly known misconception is that Mutexes and Semaphores are almost same, with the only difference being that a Mutex is capable of counting to 1, while Semaphores able to count from 0 to N.
• There is always uncertainty between binary semaphore and mutex. You may hear that a mutex is a binary semaphore, which is not correct.

What is a Semaphore?

A semaphore is simply a variable that is non-negative and shared between threads. A semaphore is a signaling mechanism, and a thread that is waiting on a semaphore can be signaled by another thread. It uses two atomic operations, 1) wait and 2) signal for the process synchronization.

A semaphore either allows or disallows access to the resource, which depends on how it is set up.

Use of Semaphore

In the case of a single buffer, we can separate the 4 KB buffer into four 1 KB buffers. Semaphore can be associated with these four buffers. This allows users and producers to work on different buffers at the same time.

Advantages of Semaphore

In my practice, here are the key positives of using semaphore:

• It allows more than one thread to access the critical section
• Semaphores are machine-independent.
• Semaphores are implemented in the machine-independent code of the microkernel.
• They do not allow multiple processes to enter the critical section.
• As there is a busy waiting schedule in semaphore, there is never a waste of process time and resources.
• They are machine-independent, which should be run in the machine-independent code of the microkernel.
• They allow flexible management of resources.

Disadvantages of Semaphores

Here are the drawbacks of semaphore that I have encountered.

• One of the biggest limitations of a semaphore is priority inversion.
• The operating system has to keep track of all calls to wait and signal semaphore.
• Their use is never enforced, but it is by convention only.
• In order to avoid deadlocks in semaphore, the Wait and Signal operations require to be executed in the correct order.
• Semaphore programming is a complex method, so there are chances of not achieving mutual exclusion.
• It is also not a practical method for large scale use as their use leads to loss of modularity.
• Semaphore is more prone to programmer error.
• It may cause deadlock or violation of mutual exclusion due to programmer error.

What is Mutex?

The full form of Mutex is Mutual Exclusion Object. It is a special type of binary semaphore which used for controlling access to the shared resource. It includes a priority inheritance mechanism to avoid extended priority inversion problems. It allows current higher priority tasks to be kept in the blocked state for the shortest time possible. However, priority inheritance does not correct priority- inversion but only minimizes its effect.

Use of Mutex

A mutex provides mutual exclusion, which can be either producer or consumer that can have the key (mutex) and proceed with their work. As long as producer fills buffer, the user needs to wait, and vice versa. In Mutex lock, all the time, only a single thread can work with the entire buffer.

Advantages of Mutex

From what I have observed, here are the key benefits of Mutex:

• Mutexes are just simple locks obtained before entering its critical section and then releasing it.
• Since only one thread is in its critical section at any given time, there are no race conditions, and data always remain consistent.

Disadvantages of Mutex

In my practice, I have identified several cons of Mutex.

• If a thread obtains a lock and goes to sleep or it is preempted, then the other thread may not able to move forward. This may lead to starvation.
• It can’t be locked or unlocked from a different context than the one that acquired it.
• Only one thread should be allowed in the critical section at a time.
• The normal implementation may lead to busy waiting state, which wastes CPU time.

Difference between Semaphore and Mutex

Based on what I have learned working with them, here’s how Mutexes and Semaphores differ:

Conclusion

In my experience, the key to choosing between mutexes and semaphores is recognizing their operational nuances. Semaphores are ideal for complex synchronizations, whereas mutexes are suited for straightforward mutual exclusions, ensuring resource safety in simpler contexts.